Two Stanford law professors argue that a legal framework for protecting online platform reputation should be responsive to theĬhanging set of practices ushered in by the Internet and capable of resolving conflicts in a fair and satisfactory way. The researchers concluded 'While these RMP/SET correlations should give pause to those who are inclined to dismiss RMP indices as meaningless, the amount of variance left unexplained in SET criteria limits the utility of RMP.' Formal in-class evaluations can only be completed by students who are registered in the course, whereas on RMP, anyone can post ratings, whether or not they have taken the course.Ĭriticism Stanford Law School and Reputation Protection 51) were each correlated with its corresponding SET factor derived from a principal components analysis of all 29 SET items. 44 with SET item 'How did the work load for this course compare to that of others of equal credit?' Further, RMP 'overall quality' (r =. 68 with SET item 'Overall, how would you rate the instructor?' Second, RMP 'ease' showed a correlation of r =. First, RMP 'overall quality' showed a correlation of only r =. This study found that the two primary RMP indices correlated weakly with their respective SET items. Using data for 426 instructors at the University of Maine, examined the relationship between RMP indices and formal in-class student evaluations of teaching (SET).

Correlation with in-class student evaluations The professor's Overall Quality rating determines whether his/her name is accompanied by a smiley face (meaning 'Good Quality'), a frowny face ('Poor Quality'), or an in-between, expressionless face ('Average Quality'). Īccording to the website's help page, 'a professor’s Overall Quality rating should reflect how well a professor teaches the course material, and how helpful he/she is both inside and outside of the classroom'. Raters may also select up to 3 tags (from a list of 20) that describe the professor. Since the website does not require users to create an account, non-students or even professors themselves can post ratings. The rater may also share if he or she would take the professor again, if the class was taken for credit, if attendance was mandatory, if the textbook was used, and what grade he or she received in the course additionally, the rater may include comments of up to 350 characters in length. To be posted, a rater must rate the course and/or professor on a 1-5 scale in the following categories: 'overall quality' and 'level of difficulty'. Furthermore, users may create a listing for any individual not already listed. On RMP, users may post a rating and review of any professor that is already listed on the site.

The site includes 8,000+ schools, 1.7 million professors, and over 19 million ratings. RMP is the largest online destination for professor ratings. Cheddar announced its acquisition of RMP from Viacom in 2018. Nagle and DeSantis later resold RMP in 2007 to Viacom's MTVU, MTV's College channel. RMP was acquired in 2005 by Patrick Nagle and William DeSantis. The site was originally launched as and converted to RateMyProfessors in 2001. ( RMP) is a review site founded in May 1999 by John Swapceinski, a software engineer from Menlo Park, California, which allows anyone to assign ratings to professors and campuses of American, Canadian, and United Kingdom institutions.

Steven schwartz rate my professor